I think it’s more the news article that’s upselling it and with it being “groundbreaking”, it is likely only at the initial stages.

Mice are usually the first phase are they do have a similar immune response (systemically), have a fast metabolism and quick to mature. They’re also clones, which helps eliminate external factors that could contribute to what they’re studying. More or less, mice are just a quicker litmus test to just show that something is possible and if it warrants a study on a closer analogue.

TL;DR: Italy finally adds a classification to a type of hate crime and defines certain circumstances required in order to help reduce/remove frivolous arguments and appeals from the defense.

AFAIU, it isn’t a blanket law and requires a specific intent to kill a woman based on her sex. It just so happens that it’s more common within relationships than out and not all deaths would fit into the definition.

There are many other hate crimes. This is just defining one of the many that are unfortunately needed, as it is and has been a prevalent issue within their country.

It’s more or less the European version of American Idol, so I can see the protests being a sizable thing

And life-long immunosuppressants with the constant mortal fear of a cough or runny nose. Sepsis is no joke and can easily develop in a matter of hours if you don’t have a healthy immune system.

Just like those charlatans peddling water with baking soda-err… I mean alkaline water.

Poor kids

The very least, he should have been banned. Instead, just a slap on the wrist

Or both…

For people curious, here’s a complete video. I skimmed through it and it looks like it starts to really devolve a bit after 40 minutes.

Hmm… A special pager…

InB4 BOOM

Aren’t nuclear and volcanic winters the only things that could reverse climate change?

Just increase the size of our seed vault/s.

There should be a paint can in the scene.

Russia is also already instigating it with having North Korean troops in the combat zone. It’ll just be a tit-for-tat response.

I’d more call it politicism, as it’s more criticizing the political state and not someones origin/heritage.

I’m gonna hazard a guess it’s supposed to be something like “Kick me,” but with a bit of it unintelligible, I could be way off.

Overhead?

They don’t really mention if it’s illegal or not to their reasoning. They only use three parameters for the decision.

source

They argue for points 2 (health risk) and 3 (commonly abused), both of which cigarettes and alcohol fit right in, but are unrestricted.