

Game recognizes game.
Game recognizes game.
You’ll often find discussions in the comments section (also your first comment to me asked me to explain my views).
You seem deaf to what I’m saying. There are cultural tensions involved. Yes people choose their ethical compliances but those choices are always constrained by cultural, educational, and structural bounds. The cultural messaging of the time.
Before this generation were the first school shooters, before them it was satanic panic related crimes, before them it was the first post WW2 street gangs.
These are all topics that insert violence into cultural frameworks without having the necessary discussions of causes and the messaging around these frameworks.
I’d call your user name “weird”, but I’m not one to use social pressures like that, and would rather have conversations where the actual issues and causes are discussed.
I’m trying to normalize that singles aren’t having sex…
… because the feeling that young men not having sex is abnormal causes a bad mindset.
Yeah they think it’s extraordinary to not be having sex when single, so it’s women’s fault.
When being sexless is the majority of what being single means.
So the anti-terrorism laws have been used before and apply to all terrorism…
My comment is mocking that incel - which basically means single and upset about it, is being made central to the headline.
Just say he’s a misogynist. Pretending it’s something abnormal for single men to not be having sex just extends the premise of “incels” (the idea that they should be upset about it, or that it’s extra).
PNAT laws increase the severity of all terrorism related prosecutions. They aren’t aimed at “incels” in particular.
Hitler, great replacement, and communicating with women, aren’t incel traits. That last one in particular.
That’s far-right stuff.
Plenty of leftwing incels.
Incel describes most single people. It’s quite a normal state of affairs to not be having sex most of the time if you’re single. Young people need to be told this far more than they are being.
The charges were terror related, there’s no special extra charge or any new laws being used “for the first time” just because he was an incel…
…also he wasn’t an incel, he was a far-right praising hitler fear of the great replacement teenager.
Pretending that women sleeping with people like that will stop them doing crimes or is somehow a pivotal factor just extends the sex obsessed and objectifying beliefs of that world view.
Using the term incel amplifies the idea that it’s a valid idea.It’s a shitty headline, so I mocked it.
Incel describes most single people. It’s quite normal, we need to stop telling men it’s not normal.
“We charge him with terrorism… Also this loser wasn’t getting enough pussy, which makes him uncool… So up the charges on that basis” -court transcript of new laws being implemented.
No, it was cost of living issues caused by Capitalist rent seeking, combined with a decline in work life balance that could only result in massive amounts of social isolation.
It’s short for taximeter, because it measures (or “meters out”) the tax you’ll be paying per distance or time travelled.
Different business models.
Spies from other nations.
Node based housing forks, coded in H2O.
Technically the IV, presence of Doctors and hospital environment are also aspects of medical practices. This study is flawed.
I don’t know why. The USS Liberty incident proved that Israel does this sort of shit.
They’re a far right government.
Everyone on the planet needs to send the same message to Russia: Your warm water ports in Crimea will be useless, drones would just sink your fleet each year.
Same for any mining minerals operations you managed to set up. The prize you’re trying to capture is no longer worth keeping it. Go home.
The change in the nature of war has made the spoils into liabilities. Drones will keep the world’s borders set for some time now.
Wouldn’t want to upset the people who have the actual Epstein list/tapes.