The issue is how you responded to people in this thread ("read the Readme.md) and when reading the readme, it’s a vague answer as to how AI is used. Gives off vibe-coded

Scope out how exactly AI used and you will get way less issues.

But being condescending and then being dismissive gets you this reaction. Own the fact that you used AI, scope out how exactly it is used and be on your way.

The readme concerning the LLM/AI is downright terrible. Which portion were generated with LLM? There is no scope for what the LLM is used, so can we assume that everything is vibe-coded at this point?

I think it’s worth learning, but I am tech literate. Using something like unraid or trueNAS is also a good way to start as it streamlines a lot of things.

But I like to know what’s going on, so Proxmox is good for me.

1 single HDD? I’d recommend you RAID up some more… or at least take my recommendation on testing your backups

RAID is not a backup solution, but an availability one. If your system doesn’t need high availability, a single HDD is acceptable if you can live with a few hours/days of downtime.

I am saying that because the prices of any storage is insane nowadays and I want people to see that 1 HDD is good enough to get started, either for homelabbing or for learning a more professional environment.

Proxmox can be daunting for beginners. I prefer it myself because it is free, but it took me a while to be comfortable in it and even then, I do basic stuff.

What’s the saying? Equality feels like oppression to the privileged?

I am a neophyte in homelabbing. What is Netbird doing exactly?

I read the github page and didn’t really understand what is the use case for that.

This is an interesting article, but the crux of the setup isn’t described : what is the configuration on your home server?

Creating a wireguard tunnel is pretty simple, but managing how everything is handled behind the VPN is more challenging.

it makes sense. My rationale behind putting the NAS on the MGMT and then passing disk space through mounted drives is that I can create any number of VLANs if I want, and give bits and pieces of the NAS drive through the services, without ever having to change my NAS configuration (other than creating the shares I need)

I wanted to just add more storage space to proxmox and distribute it through the services, but considering the prices of NVMe drives, the rock5c with the sata hat was a lot more cost effective since I had 2x 2TB SSD not doing much in my computer.

WKUK was making a comeback during COVID with lots of small videos and I really enjoyed them.

Your argument boils down to : If there is history of colonialism, requiring a basic level of the most spoken language is bad. Otherwise it’s good.

Society at large has been multi-cultural for as long as human written history has existed through conquest, war and trade.

There is a possibility to require people to both learn the country’s main language while keeping their culture. I live in a city where that happens on a daily basis and everyone is better for it.

We can be both upset at what our ancestors and parents did and integrate new arrivant within the current state of the society they arrive in.

Both aren’t exclusive. I get what you are saying, but I don’t see that as hypocrisy.

And again, there is a distinction between integration and assimilation.

So we should only expect immigrants to learn the current local language only if the country they immigrate to isn’t a colonialist country?

What hypocrisy?

The discussion conflates a lots of things. So to be clear :

We are talking about someone moving to a new country, not a country invading another country and forcing them to learn the new language to assimilate them.

We can be mad at China for annexing Tibet for example, forcing them to learn mandarin and forbidding them to talk to their native language.

But if I decide to go live in China, then it is not far fetched to expect me to learn mandarin, regardless of its history. It is two different things.

Context matters.

I live in Canada. Should we make real efforts to restitute Natives? Absolutely. Does that mean that we can’t expect new immigrants to learn the current local language because of our past?

We can’t change the past, but we can make better in the future and integrating new arrivants is necessary and beneficial for everyone.

If I decide to go live in Germany for example, is it reasonable for me to learn German? What about Haïti? Or Jamaica? Is it only acceptable in non colonialist countries?

I understand that the track record about assimilating other culture is terrible. However, not speaking the local language where you live is extremely isolating. If you’ve ever had to live in a place where they don’t speak your native language, you know the feeling.

For everything that is wrong about our immigration system, I believe that asking new immigrants to make an earnest effort to learn the local language is normal. We can’t change the past, but we can do better in the future. And making sure that a new immigrant integrates to his new country is helping both the immigrant and the country that welcomes him.

I run opnsense, so I need to dump pi-hole. But I don’t have the energy right now to do that.

Pi-Hole was pretty straightforward at the time and I did not look back since then. Annoying, but easy.

The post I am replying to is specifying Canada, US and Australia. Not China.

I agree that assimilating vs integration is a different thing.

Genuine question : why do requiring a earnest effort to learn the language of the country a bad thing?

There is a shit ton of bad things about our immigration laws, but forcing immigrants to learn the local language isn’t one of them.

Language barriers isolate people and learning the local language helps reduce the isolation, benefiting everyone.

That’s my case. I send every new subdomain to my nginx IP on pi-hole and then use nginx as a reverse proxy

Tell that to someone starting out and look at their deer in the headlight face. Then you’ll realize that the point went over your head.