What about “automod”? What if there’s no response?

Lemmy mods respond to messages?

Maybe step one of the protest is to stop buying from China

I bought the SmithTix tickets!

This monopoly is one of the best examples of our government being broken by lobbying. This problem is a least 30 years old and nothing has changed in all that time.

Am I showing my age if I suggest ImageMagick?

“Uh-oh the US is headed for recession, how can we delay this thing?”

“I know, we’ll say they want to steal our tech”

<giggles>

Then Putin patted little Donald on the head and told him to run along and play now.

First say something crazy. Then while they are talking him out of the insane, Trump gets closer to what he wants

All along…if they don’t get involved when Ukraine is invaded then they will have to get involved when Poland is.

Nonsense. He hasn’t lost support. The “election redo” plays right into Maduro’s hands. It gives him time to come up with better fraud.

PATH to a Palestinian state does not mean he’s serious. TIMELINE to a Palestinian state would indicate he means it.

And the death and dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi

Do you want to make terrorists? Because this is how you make desperate people feel like their only option is to become terrorists.

I think the thing we are trying to regulate is the muscular advantage imparted by certain hormones over certain periods of time. Whether the person being measured has been labeled male or female doesn’t make any difference.

There’s a single quote of half a sentence from the New York Post, other than that where is the “right wing campaign”? Referencing Twitter and quoting other journalists does not equal journalism. Moreover, I see no reference at all to women being “purged” from women’s sports. This story is 98% opinion and 2% facts.

This isn’t about the external genitalia, not sure why you keep going there. This is about the levels of hormones over an amount of time that is known to impart a muscular advantage. The IOC needs a formula for this to decide who can be in the class. This would not be a determination of who is female.

Publishing the evidence would violate the athlete’s privacy.

Exactly. And the outcry over unfairness in women’s sports is an effort to save it, not destroy it.

Why isn’t this labeled as an opinion piece? There’s nothing in here to substantiate the headline and almost no journalism. I’m not used to work like this from The Intercept.