I admit I haven’t looked deeply into it. I understood both are supposed to have a similar implementation to sliding sync, I don’t think either has implemented simplified sliding sync yet.
These might help understand its current state:
https://github.com/girlbossceo/conduwuit/issues/532
https://github.com/girlbossceo/conduwuit/issues/107
Can’t help much since I haven’t tried running a Matrix server in a while now, but are you using Conduit or Conduwuit?
Conduwuit is in much more active development and has more features implemented and bugs fixed.
You could also try opening an issue on Github / ask them on Matrix.
Dendrite doesn’t support sliding sync afaik https://github.com/element-hq/dendrite/issues/3236
Other than Synapse, I know Conduwuit has sliding sync support.
Neat! Glad to hear
Yeah they’ve done a good job with their documentation.
I was tempted by it several times already to try some features I didn’t even consider using.
Yup.
Tailscale has some documentation about it, and also a bunch of examples (And apparently one specific to Immich).
Since you already got some replies, a bit of a different approach would be to set those services up using Docker and having Tailscale as a sidecar to each one of those.
You will then be able to access each one as a seperate device. immich.*.ts.net etc.
And in general I didn’t expect to see praise for a group that has “A Curse Upon the Jews” as part of their official slogan.
Just chiming in about Tailscale.
The initial connection uses their server just to reach / connect to the other peer. After that, the peers are connected directly and all communication is direct.
Jevolk