tahira@hilariouschaos.com to Conservatives@hilariouschaos.comEnglish · 3 months agoUnderstanding the Sex Binarywww.realityslaststand.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up13
arrow-up13external-linkUnderstanding the Sex Binarywww.realityslaststand.comtahira@hilariouschaos.com to Conservatives@hilariouschaos.comEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squaredemonmittenhands@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoIt’s not though. It really really isn’t. The existence of even one intersex person means what you’re saying is nonsense.
minus-squaretahira@hilariouschaos.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoRead the article. The author has a PhD in evolutionary biology and knows more than you. The “sex binary” does not entail that every human is unambiguously either male or female, even though the vast majority are. He wrote another article where he cites that you are 100% wrong and this definition has been used since the 19th century: https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/citations-for-the-gamete-based-definition
minus-squaredemonmittenhands@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoHe also wants to be on Tucker Carlson and Rogan so he’s willing to lie about shit. This guy doesn’t represent the scientific consensus. Just a turd trying to cash a paycheck.
minus-squaretahira@hilariouschaos.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoHere’s the great thing about science: Is he wrong? If you can’t cite or explain how he’s wrong, hurling insults doesn’t do shit. He very much represents the scientific consensus, as explained by the link I just gave you that you clearly didn’t read.
It’s not though. It really really isn’t. The existence of even one intersex person means what you’re saying is nonsense.
Read the article. The author has a PhD in evolutionary biology and knows more than you.
He wrote another article where he cites that you are 100% wrong and this definition has been used since the 19th century: https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/citations-for-the-gamete-based-definition
He also wants to be on Tucker Carlson and Rogan so he’s willing to lie about shit. This guy doesn’t represent the scientific consensus. Just a turd trying to cash a paycheck.
Here’s the great thing about science: Is he wrong? If you can’t cite or explain how he’s wrong, hurling insults doesn’t do shit.
He very much represents the scientific consensus, as explained by the link I just gave you that you clearly didn’t read.