British police faced backlash on Tuesday over the case of an 18-year-old student who was handcuffed as he lay dying from stab wounds after his killer falsely alleged a racist attack.
The rational solution is to execute the murderer, jail the family for a long time for obstruction of justice and when their sentences are up deport them.
The police who cuffed a dying man should be jailed for negligent manslaughter.
It does reduce the amount of people to feed and house, but the right to life and the right to be innocent before proven guilty both hold. Cops being the judge, jury and executioner is inherently unreliable, and human beings inherently have biases based on thousands of factors, so there WILL be officers stating “oh nah they attacked me” without the attack actually happening and their life being taken just because the officer has a racist or biased interpretation of their behaviour.
Also, seeming that you’re from aussie.zone, it appears you are of course an Aussie like me, so you should have already caught that we are multicultural, and we are going through a tough time of the public discriminating against itself. Extrajudicial killings by law enforcement will amplify this.
Um, what part of the word “Sikh” made you think of sharia?
Now, as for the killer, he got the highest punishment a reasonable country gives: life in prison.
Beyond that, it regularly starts happening that people who aren’t guilty get executed. It’s very hard to write a law describing when a murder is “clear enough”. Nobody has managed so far. All the countries which sentence people to death sometimes execute people who aren’t guilty.
Just to be clear, i absolutely do not support sharia law or the death penalty in general for the exact reasons you stated.
It’s just dumbasses like the other guy who complain, that we “Import sharia” and then basically demand the same fucking thing.
No. You’re adults and leaders. You can be angry but your response should be rational, not emotional.
I think the rational response to most of the stuff Farage says is rage.
The rational solution is to execute the murderer, jail the family for a long time for obstruction of justice and when their sentences are up deport them.
The police who cuffed a dying man should be jailed for negligent manslaughter.
Gonna have to stop you right there
His guilt is beyond any doubt and a bullet is cheap.
There is zero reason to house and feed him.
He should be executed and his rotten family should pick up the bill.
Careful with that edge, you may injure someone with it.
You think the death penalty is edgy? It has been used for thousands of years across numerous societies.
And hasn’t solved a thing
It solves the need to feed, house, and guard murderous scum.
In cases where there is zero doubt a person is a murderer it should be used.
There have been numerous cases where racists have had “zero doubt” that a black person has done a crime.
You keep making the wording on that “zero doubt murder” bill more air-tight, and I’ll tell you when it’s acceptable, Sisyphus.
It does reduce the amount of people to feed and house, but the right to life and the right to be innocent before proven guilty both hold. Cops being the judge, jury and executioner is inherently unreliable, and human beings inherently have biases based on thousands of factors, so there WILL be officers stating “oh nah they attacked me” without the attack actually happening and their life being taken just because the officer has a racist or biased interpretation of their behaviour.
Also, seeming that you’re from aussie.zone, it appears you are of course an Aussie like me, so you should have already caught that we are multicultural, and we are going through a tough time of the public discriminating against itself. Extrajudicial killings by law enforcement will amplify this.
Rape as a punishment has been also, do you want to do that to him as well?
Don’t be ridiculous, I’m not a zionist.
Ah yes, the sharia way, nice.
Show me which part of that is Sharia law.
Death for death.
Bzzzzzt wrong! The answer to killing under Sharia law is Diyah or blood money.
Thanks for playing.
How about you look up Qisas smartass
Literally every punishment I said is practiced under Western law so go huff more paint or whatever it is you losers do.
Um, what part of the word “Sikh” made you think of sharia?
Now, as for the killer, he got the highest punishment a reasonable country gives: life in prison.
Beyond that, it regularly starts happening that people who aren’t guilty get executed. It’s very hard to write a law describing when a murder is “clear enough”. Nobody has managed so far. All the countries which sentence people to death sometimes execute people who aren’t guilty.
Just to be clear, i absolutely do not support sharia law or the death penalty in general for the exact reasons you stated. It’s just dumbasses like the other guy who complain, that we “Import sharia” and then basically demand the same fucking thing.
Go back and read who brought up Sharia.
It wasn’t me champ.
Oops, sorry - reading in a hurry is a great way to make mistakes.