• AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    24 hours ago

    You aren’t adressing what they said

    Every part of their statement was either reaffirmed or backed up with additional supporting statements in what I wrote. Either you didn’t read what I typed, or you simply don’t have the greatest reading comprehension and can’t see how my statements back up what they originally posted.

    you are just stating random facts I never disagreed with.

    Those ‘random facts’ are directly reaffirming the other person’s statements, which you called “the stupidest fucking shit I have seen today.” Is it safe to say that you calling something stupid probably means you disagree with it?

    You are disingenuous

    Keep telling yourself that, I’m sure you gotta fuel that anger somehow. It’s not you who is wrong, it must be everyone else!

    • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      calling something stupid probably means you disagree with it?

      Jesus fucking christ dude biological sex is everything you have describe what are you even disagreeing with because I am disagreeing with the sentiment of a fucking idiot I am not talking about gender.

      • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        biological sex is everything you have describe what are you even disagreeing with

        Someone said, at least to summarize, that it’s stupid to think there’s only two sexes, and that people are intentionally ignorant of that fact.

        You called that statement “stupid fucking shit”, then in another comment said “I disagreed with this fucking idiot that’s the extent of it.” as if that changed the fact that what you were disagreeing with was their statement.

        Thus, the understanding is that you think those ideas are stupid, and thus incorrect.

        Even now, you just said “I am not talking about gender.” Guess what? I’m not either. I’m talking about societal understanding of sex characteristics and how they get classified, just like the original comment you said was stupid was doing.

        Of course I’m talking about biological sex, that’s the primary component of the thing you called stupid. What else am I supposed to be addressing here? You literally re-stated your point again, saying “This is the stupidest fucking shit I have seen today” while specifically quoting the part of the original comment addressing biological sex. Do you need a refresher on what you yourself quoted? Here it is:

        In conclusion, “biological sex” is just another gross simplification created by people who’s minds are so pathetic they can’t comprehend reality and so choose to live by mantra founded in disproven pseudo-sciences, religion, and other excuses to avoid critical thinking, and then put themselves in positions of power.

        Does that statement not literally begin by addressing biological sex?

        Do you even know the topic of the argument you’re having right now? Are you just blindly disagreeing with people without reading the words you’re quoting? I’m not sure if you’re simply angry for the sake of it and ignorant of what you’re talking about, or if you’re just trolling on purpose, but regardless I’m done with this comment chain. You clearly aren’t acting in good faith, and you clearly don’t have a grasp on what it is you even started arguing about.