• meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Here’s the thing though, pretty much everything you just said is wrong. It’s not that simple if you think of humans as any other animal. Here’s a video link that is pretty long, but dives fairly deep into this topic that is massive from a scientific point of view.

    https://youtu.be/nVQplt7Chos

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Woah. I don’t have an hour and a half to dissect all the ways an animal with a penis and an animal with a vagina may not fit the standard classifications of male and female. Not discrediting that there are so many different life forms out there that can’t possibly just be two categories, but you also can’t say that “pretty much everything I said is wrong.” If I wanna breed dogs, I’m gonna need two types of genitalia. Elephants? Same. Salmon? Ducks? Lots of animals can be classified in that way. Not all their characteristics, but their reproductive traits for sure.

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah but toilets and changing rooms aren’t for reproduction.

        If you go entirely by who has a penis or not, at least you allow some post operative trans people to live freely, but I’m not going to be checking any genitals at the toilet door, nor doing any blood tests for that matter.

        This guidance deliberately leaves trans people with two bad options: go in one toilet and be harassed or attacked for being trans or go in another and risk being attacked legally.