Otter@lemmy.ca to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 hours agoGitHub - minio/minio: "This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 25, 2026. It is now read-only."github.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up181
arrow-up181external-linkGitHub - minio/minio: "This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 25, 2026. It is now read-only."github.comOtter@lemmy.ca to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 hours agoNot if you want to validate S3 compatibility for an actual future use case or, * can you imagine*, just for the fun of it.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·7 hours agoi’ll give you the second case, but nobody should plan for putting stuff on aws with the world as it looks right now…
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-228 minutes agoPractically every other block storage provider offers an S3-compatible API.
minus-squarepticrix@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoI use S3 with OVH at my workplace. So it’s not just aws / google.
minus-squaresearabbit@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoGenuine question, what are the alternatives not called Azure/GCP?
Not if you want to validate S3 compatibility for an actual future use case or, * can you imagine*, just for the fun of it.
i’ll give you the second case, but nobody should plan for putting stuff on aws with the world as it looks right now…
Practically every other block storage provider offers an S3-compatible API.
I use S3 with OVH at my workplace. So it’s not just aws / google.
Genuine question, what are the alternatives not called Azure/GCP?