“Although people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait live under different systems, we will respect each other and move towards each other,” Cheng said, adding: “We will seek systemic solutions to prevent and avoid war.”
Both Xi and Cheng said they would uphold the 1992 Consensus and opposed Taiwan’s independence


Honestly, I don’t know what China has to gain from taking Taiwan by force versus what they can gain much more cheaply by just befriending and trading with it.
They could arrange an on-paper reunification. The key is to choose your words carefully to avoid upsetting anyone and give as much lip service as possible to Beijing while giving many of the “real” benefits to Taipei.
How well did “one country two systems” work for Hong Kong?
By submitting to the PRC, the ROC loses it’s foreign allies guaranteeing it’s autonomy.
Also the microprocessors we need for things like, missiles and other fancy weapons are made primarily in Taiwan, China wants control of that.
This is not “one country, two systems”. This is “one nation, two countries”. It’s not an irrelevant distinction.
The words are phrased extremely carefully to avoid subjugating Taiwan to Beijing. Perhaps it makes more sense to those who know Chinese. The entire situation is basically a word game at this point. Nobody really seems to want to disturb the status quo, but words have to be said.
ROC is not autonomous, its satellite state of USA to intimidate China