• a4ng3l@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I purposely avoided bringing science in this. You did to match your own narrative. No need for science when everywhere around us, plainly visible, religions are causing wars and sufferings.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I would expect « worldviews » to be rooted in reality and science rather than in mysticism.

      This is you bringing science into this.

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          We’re talking about worldviews which is just another name for your beliefs about the world. Whatever you base your worldview on is what you believe. That is a basic fact about how words work.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Let’s go back and forget about all the things you’ve said that are wrong and all the ways you’ve contradicted yourself?

          I don’t think so…

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You purposely avoided an angle which plainly shows the error of your assertions? And you’re accusing me of “matching my own narrative” when I show those errors with that angle which you ostensibly avoided?

      Also, these are your literal words:

      In addition I would expect « worldviews » to be rooted in reality and science rather than in mysticism.

      So no, you didn’t avoid bringing science into this.

      Also:

      No need for science when everywhere around us, plainly visible, religions are causing wars and sufferings.

      Bold words for someone trying to rationalize forcing your worldview on others by claiming it’s scientific and therefore deserves an exception from the “don’t force your worldview on others” rule…

      Have you considered competing in the Olympics? Because those are some impressive mental gymnastics…

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Heyaaaa now you’re using fallacies :) I’ll gladly go for olympics if there was a fitting discipline yes.

        By all means keep defending Rhodes antiquated systems that promote abuse and suffering. I know where we both stand and it suffice to me; you’re never going to change my views on that.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Really? Point out the fallacy that I used? Cause I’ve already pointed out several that you have.

          I’m not defending any systems, I’m defending people’s rights to believe in the worldviews of their own choosing, and categorically rejecting any system that would force one set of beliefs on everyone else.

          systems that promote abuse and suffering.

          You think atheists can’t promote abuse and suffering? What about the Bolsheviks who committed genocide in the name of purging religion? You support that suffering, because the people you don’t like are the ones suffering?