• MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Government contracts out everything to the lowest builder.

    This is not always the case. In reality, the bid often goes to the company with political connections.

    They might also look at things like timeframe and job creation. So, supposing that all other things are equal: One company plans to use robotic labor, one is using human labor. There’s going to be a lot of pressure from unions to hire the human labor. Or one company is using imported materials and the other is using local materials.

    That’s not to say that the system isn’t biased and flawed. It most definitely is. But this idea that the “lowest bidder” always gets the job is just not true.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Also, any large system is inefficient. People point to governmental inefficiency as a reason to privatize everything, but not only are large enterprises also inefficient in ways, but they must seek profit.

      In reality, while many areas do have legitimate problems that could use better oversight, a decent amount of what our government does for us works pretty well, outside corruption and fascists working to break our democracy. It’s also a fact that a lot of people think a lot of things are much easier than they are.

      • MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        not only are large enterprises also inefficient in ways, but they must seek profit.

        This deserves repeating.

        A government job often requires highly skilled union workers, thus higher pay for the workers. A corporation can find the cheapest labor, but it’s not always the best. The savings are then pocketed as profit, essentially giving shareholders a free government check while labor is poorly compensated.