China has approved a sweeping new law which claims to help promote “ethnic unity” - but critics say it will further erode the rights of minority groups.

On paper, it aims to promote integration among the 56 officially recognised ethnic groups, dominated by the Han Chinese, through education and housing. But critics say it cuts people off from their language and culture.

It mandates that all children should be taught Mandarin before kindergarten and up until the end of high school. Previously students could study most of the curriculum in their native language such as Tibetan, Uyghur or Mongolian.

  • Kacarott@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    While I don’t actually think that mandating the official national language as a class in schools is at all a problem (or a new idea), your argument is blatant whataboutism. Something cannot be justified merely by comparing it to somewhere else (especially the US, I might add).

    • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not whataboutism when there’s a clear bias in terms of what country the BBC is criticizing. Having a national language and requiring it to be taught in schools is incredibly common for many states including the UK. Why is China singled out so often for things almost every state does?

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        You do understand that the widely recognized genocide in North America is and has been criticized for this, right? The language deprivation has mostly wrapped up in political terms but a linguistic rebirth is still struggling financially and in many nations/tribes will never fully recover.

        China is not being singled out, but called out based on historical familiarity with the process.

      • Kacarott@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So call out the journalistic bias, or hypocritical behaviour of the BBC. But if the topic in general is brought up in conversation, just pointing to the US as some kind of justification, is definitely whataboutism. It sidesteps actual critical thinking by playing to familiarity: “well if this country does it, then it must be fine!”, which is clearly a logical fallacy.

        All countries actions should be criticized equally. No countries actions should be justified by being the same as another country.