• floofloof@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    240
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Drop Site News reporter Ryan Grim noted that, in addition to striking what appears to have been a defenseless boat, the US also didn’t help rescue any of the shipwrecked men who were aboard the vessel.

    “The Sri Lanka Navy was left to pull the dead bodies from the water,” Grim commented. “I am hard pressed to think of any other nation throughout history that would do something so cowardly and despicable. We are genuinely in a league of our own, and American media—mostly shrugging off the bombing of a girls school and acting as if carpet bombing Tehran is a normal military tactic—is deeply complicit.”

    They torpedoed an unarmed ship and watched as everyone drowned. This is the US military under a drunken white supremacist fratboy working for a senile pedophile rapist.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 day ago

      Iirc, its an unwritten law of sailors… You rescue anyone at sea, even the enemy if you can. Drowning is a horrible death.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You at least do what you can to give them a fighting chance.

        A radio message would have at least let them abandon ship in a (semi) orderly manner. Hell, even a solar ping would have got them into life jackets.

        Normally, a sub wouldn’t risk this. They knew in advance, however, that the ship was not currently armed.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      1 day ago

      Typically submarines aren’t in a position to offer refuge to shipwrecked sailors, but to my recollection there hasn’t been submarine warfare since WWII. They sank a ship that didn’t present any threat and likely could have been neutralized with a number of alternate approaches.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The UK used submarines during the Falklands war.

        The decision was made to sink an Argentinian warship. Critically, they didn’t attack the escort ship. They left it to recover the sailors. Apparently it horrified the British command when it ran, leaving sailors in the water.

        A simple radio message “Move and we will sink you. Take no offensive actions and we will give you 5 minutes to launch lifeboats first.” Hell, even a sonar ping would have given them half a chance.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yup but also, the idea of submarines providing rescue went out the window. Even the nazis were trying to rescue people at one point, and the allies attacked them after they broadcasted their rescue attempts

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laconia_incident

        The US has the most powerful military in the world. This was just cruelty

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Hey hey whoa whoa whoa, hold up there friend. You forgot Christian nationalist death cultist and pseudo-crusader-wannabe.