• Not a newt@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Your reply to the above comment is a bit caustic. Here’s my take on your argument that explains your position in a rational way:

    The bomb-proof and repair free nature of the Rolex comes into play in situations where replacement parts are not readily available. Consider an astronaut on a trip to Mars: they are out in space for months, in a ship where both space and weight are at a premium. A disposable time piece may be cheap on Earth, but without the means to replace it, it becomes a liability.

    Similarly, someone on an exploration to a remote region - let’s say a member of the yearly British Antarctic Survey expedition - will not be able to replace a broken timepiece until they return at the end of the season. Not everyone needs a reliable time piece, but those who do - such as medics measuring a patient’s heart rate with a stethoscope - might go for something that has a lower failure rate.

    Sure, a $5 timepiece is probably enough for most people, and wearing a Rolex as a status symbol is dumb, but that’s not the only use case for them.

    • bufalo1973@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Some Casio “black” watches have been recovered in some gardens after being buried for years and were still working 🤷‍♂️