French President Emmanuel Macron on Saturday, February 14, urged calm and restraint after the fatal beating of a 23-year-old French youth aligned with the far-right on the sidelines of a conference by a hard-left lawmaker in the southeastern city of Lyon.

The death of the young man – identified only as Quentin – has intensified tensions between France’s far-right and radical left who are both eyeing 2027 presidential elections.

He had been hospitalized in Lyon on Thursday after being attacked while providing what his supporters said was security for a protest against an appearance by hard-left MEP Rima Hassan at the Lyon branch of the Sciences Po university.

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s radical dude. That’s rad.

    Radical has always been progressive in america. Right out of the civil rights movement co-opted by hippies.

    If you are backing down to the nazis and letting them change the meaning of words I am going to call you a weak dog.

    • Alexander Daychilde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There is nothing radical about progressives in the US. As a progressive… we are centrist in most of the other 32 OECD (“developed”) countries.

      Radical left would start with things like no private property, ownership of everything by all, things like that.

      So no, friend, I’m not changing the meaning of anything. Calling progressives in the US “radical” is already changing the meaning and wussing out on what actual radical change would be.

      • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You have this negative association with the word that is entirely adopted from the right. The civil rights movement was radical, dude.

          • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You ignored my points you just want to be agreed with you never engaged my points which actually contradicted you. Your point is that progressives in america aren’t progressives because progressives in other countries are more progressive? But they are still progressive, you are still progressive. But because I don’t immediate agree with you, you say I am ignoring your points, I would say that you aren’t progressive at all. Because that isn’t how discussion works, that’s hmmm. Maybe there is a name for “agree with me or else” ??

            • Alexander Daychilde@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Your point is that progressives in america aren’t progressives because progressives in other countries are more progressive?

              No. As I stated, the “radical left” in the US is not radical.

              Anyway, we’re not gonna agree on this, which is fine. I’m not forcing you to. I hadn’t felt you addressed my points, but this time around you did seem to do so, so I still want you to have a lovely day. :)

              • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Observe the use of the term radical in the US after the civil rights movement. It’s really not as easy as your personal opinion there is more going to this.

                E: And if it’s progressive to be more left than right in america, I think it tracks that radical is more left than left in america.