• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As much as I’d love to believe this, ‘Gaza disarmed’ sounds a lot to me like “We’ll try this exact same thing again next year”.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Next year? It’s more like Russia saying they’ll stop attacking if Ukraine surrenders and accepts being conquered.

      It’s basically saying “we will stop the war if you let us exterminate you”.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And we see how that already went when Ukraine gave up their nukes.

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m sorry, what were you expecting here?

      This is more or less the best cease fire we could think of for the short term:

      They demanded the hostages back (guessing most are dead by now).

      Gaza disarmed? I don’t even know what that means, but whatever.

      What is the magic other term you’re planning to get? A pinky promise to not do it again?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        What is the magic other term you’re planning to get? A pinky promise to not do it again?

        My point isn’t whether this is the best possible terms that can be expected. My point is that Israel isn’t acting in good faith, and we (international observers) should all be acutely and actively aware of that fact.