For years, Vice President JD Vance came to know Charlie not merely as an ally, but as a beloved friend. Today, Vance takes up the microphone for his fallen friend and hosts The Charlie Kirk Show. Vance and others at the White House share their memories of the man who has become an immortal American hero and Christian martyr.

VP Vance hosts the Charlie Kirk show, I found this talk extremely compelling both for its staunch appeal to free speech, but not condemning those who disagree. It’s worth watching - in full - regardless of political ties.

TLDW: It’s both a remembrance of the departed, and a condemnation of the celebration of violence against someone who would debate anyone.

Note - I’m not a conservative, very far from it. I however was very disturbed by the recent assassination, and I’ve been trying to parse the rhetoric, I thought it is very relevant to this community. What I found most alarming is that people are actioning violence using only vague references about what someone said, rather then what they actually said - a very sad game of political telephone inciting violence. This has to stop. Honestly, the us vs them mentality is very much part of the problem (a thing which JD Vance falls into in this very video).

summerizer

Summary of the video (approx. 2h05m)

  • Host & setting

    • The program is The Charlie Kirk Show, hosted by Vice President JD Vance, broadcasting from his office in the White House complex.
    • Early remarks are delivered to a live audience; he states, “Mr. President, … this room is 100% with you,” and references that “today is our 2-year-old’s birthday.”
    • Framing: “America’s future is a series of choices,” describing a “slow-motion national decline.”
  • Charlie Kirk tribute & context

    • Multiple segments memorialize Charlie Kirk, repeatedly stating he was killed by an assassin’s bullet and discussing not letting the assassin “silence Charlie’s movement.”
    • He says an FBI investigation is underway and that they are “on top of this.”
    • Guests and staff share personal stories about Charlie’s impact (including TPUSA events and community building).
  • Guest segments (as identified in the video)

    • Stephen Miller — introduced as White House Deputy Chief of Staff and a friend of Charlie.
      • Discusses the aftermath of the assassination and broader political themes (speech, movement, elections, students/TPUSA).
    • Panel of White House staff / friends
      • Mentions include Taylor Budawich (identified as a White House deputy chief of staff), Kayn Door (referenced alongside staff roles), and Andrew Kulv (described as deputy communications director and a longtime friend of Charlie).
      • Topics include teamwork inside the White House, campaign/election activity, and mentions of Arizona and Pennsylvania.
    • Caroline/Carolyn Levit — introduced as the White House Press Secretary.
      • Shares experiences at the press podium, says she prays before briefings, and speaks about the president’s and Charlie’s influence.
    • Tucker Carlson
      • Reacts to the assassination context and larger movement themes.
    • Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
      • Introduced as Secretary of Health and Human Services.
      • Notes coming from a prominent Democratic family; discusses COVID-era censorship he says he experienced and why that was a national concern.
    • White House Chief of Staff (later segment)
      • Joins to discuss governing and campaign-related themes; battleground states are referenced.
  • Issues & claims discussed

    • Free speech / censorship
      • Repeated emphasis on protecting speech, especially in light of COVID-era censorship claims.
    • Elections & movement
      • Recurrent focus on organizing, student outreach (TPUSA), and continuing Charlie’s mission.
  • Closing notes & tone

    • Spiritual elements are present, including a recitation of the Lord’s Prayer (“Our Father…”).
    • The program reiterates moving forward with unity, campus engagement, and honoring Charlie Kirk’s legacy.
  • jet@hackertalks.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I found the representation of Kirk very compelling as it appears his chief weapon was open and free dialog with anyone, really digging into the human. That is refreshing compared to those we often see advocating for censorship and violence against those who they disagree with (or think they disagree with, or are told they disagree with).