• ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Thank goodness.

    Honda might have dropped quality a bit over the last decade, but they’re nothing on the dodginess of Nissan.

    I simply wouldn’t buy a modern Nissan vehicle.

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Honestly thank God.

    I was really worried about how this was only going to drag down Honda.

    I used to love Nissan. They made several of my dream cars.

    Unfortunately it’s been quite some time since they made anything very good imo.

    Currently have a reputation of meh reliability and meh driving experience.

    They don’t offer anything to entice someone away from Toyota or Honda.

    I hope Nissan can come back but idk how they do that without a serious overhaul of their whole business from the ground up.

    • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Honda needs decent trucks. Nissan can make a decent truck.

      Nissan needs decent CVT transmissions. Honda can make decent CVTs.

      As an outside observer, I figured just those 2 things would make it worth it.

      • gearheart@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I can agree with this. Problem is Nissan wanted their CEO.and board members to retain control of the company.

        Obviously it would be a bad idea since I’m sure it’s best to avoid Nissan to take down Honda with their bad decisions.

        Nissan picked their CEO and boardmembers over the entire Japanese and American Nissan workforce.

        • commander@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Nissan picked their CEO and boardmembers over the entire Japanese and American Nissan workforce.

          Disgusting. They can rot on their own.

          Never buying nissan.

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        My little brother said the same thing. I think you’re both right. Clearly that wasn’t enough to push the deal through though.

        • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          IMO the 1st gens are the only true pathfinder. And it’s 2nd gen brother with FAS a not so close second.

          I hadn’t even paid attention to the abomination it’s become in the last few years.

          • sartalon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I fell in love with the first gens, but by the time I was able to buy one, it was a '96. 4WD and a standard. Terrible gas mileage, but I loved that baby and she always got me where I was going.

            But I agree, the first gens were awesome.

            • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I’ve still got a 96 4wd 5spd Hardbody for when I need a truck to do truck things. Over 300k miles and still going strong.

              Slapping the hardbody badge on a 3rd gen frontier isn’t as bad as what they did with the pathfinder, but it’s still insulting.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yes but whats the gain to merge the 2 brands just for a modicum improvement?

        bring them together when each can contribute something great, not just to limp along together

    • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Honda could have put honda engines in them and let Nissan just do their own styling.

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Let Nissan do the styling? No, no, no. They already vomited out the Juke and Cube, we don’t need more vehicular abominations out there on the roads…

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        You don’t need to merge with Nissan to do that if you’re Honda. Just buy out their design team. Much cheaper lol.

        Edit: spelling

        • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I agree, I’m just saying that’s what I would have seen them doing. See my other comment that the rumor was Japanese government pressured them into it.

        • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          If they were pressured into a merger by the Japanese government, what is the path forward? You could a) wind down Nissan or b) solve their major problem by putting Honda engines and transmissions in them. Which also brings their engine r&d cost to 0.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It seems like if Honda has any interest left in in Nissan, they’ll just buy it out of bankruptcy when that occurs. The only other chance Nissan seems to have is if there is a non-automotive company that wants to become one.

    • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      At the start of this I heard ideas that the Japanese government was pressuring them so that Nissan stock (held by many retirement funds) didn’t go to 0.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Have you owned one?

      They are unreliable and even Nissan itself cannot fix them

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They are very popular for carshare companies. I have rented a NV200 from a carshare for picking up a TV before and it was a nice experience and very inexpensive.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Maybe in Europe?, the electric version never made it to North America

          Only the Leaf made it and they cannot even fix them. My friends are on their third vattery pack in 4 years of ownership; last replacement took 8 months

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Why they want to sell them to Tesla? Ignoring that Nissan has nothing to offer to them (chademo? LOL), all Elmo is going to do is fire everyone and run the company to the ground. Any toddler can do that.

      • drop_and_run@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Nissan has manufacturing plants in Tennessee and Mississippi that Tesla may want to get ahold of. In exchange Nissan gets enough cash to survive a while longer until they decide how to waste it.

        (DAE remember the Leaf? Shit was dope. What the hell happened?)

        • someguy3@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Not much point in assembly plants for ICE cars. Why pay for what’s essentially a warehouse.