Welcome to version v1.109.0 of Immich. This release introduces an additional way for you to support Immich financially as well as bug fixes for various issues. Some of the highlights in this release include:

Immich license pricing is $25 per user or $99 per server for a lifetime license.

  • gradyp@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am a huge fan of immich, been running it for quite a while, it started as just phone photo backup but it’s good enough that I’ve made it my primary photo repository (fully backed up of course). I will absolutely pay for a license but count me as one who doesn’t really like the terminology used.

    I would happily put a donated or supporter badge to show off, but the unlicensed just feels a bit wrong. I have no trouble paying for software, especially as useful as immich, but in the enshittifying world we live in, such language gives one pause.

  • cron@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    For me, the license stuff is odd. They offer a license model with two tiers (user / server), yet the license seems to do nothing (except showing a little badge). Also, it is a one time payment which will likely not be substantial in the future.

    Why not create a “supporter” tier for maybe $2 per month or so, this would bring some recurring income without the fears of paywalling the product.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        They completely miss the point of free software. The idea is that you can fork it after a hostel take over. The irony is that if they start forcing anti features they might end up with the community jumping ship.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
    HASS Home Assistant automation software
    HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
    nginx Popular HTTP server

    [Thread #878 for this sub, first seen 19th Jul 2024, 06:45] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • Morethanevil@lemmy.fedifriends.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    From Discord

    Copy this to custom CSS in the adminpanel and the license banner is gone:

    .license-status{
    display:none !important;
    }
    

    It is possible to set the status to licensed too vua the database, but I didn’t try it.

    I hope it will only be this banner. Kavita has had a donation button too and 2 updates further it was a floating button. The whole thing about licensing is heavily discussed on Discord.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Immich joined FUTO, and FUTO’s model is that their stuff costs money but if you haven’t paid you’re not restricted.

        A bit weird but they (FUTO) are trying to experiment with a new model.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          FUTO is the same organization that doesn’t believe in Foss. The want one creator to have power over users. I don’t think that model is going to work out.

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s not quite their position. They believe the OSI decides what counts as Open Source based on what benefits big tech who fund them. Basically, they think it’s wrong to argue that something cannot be considered open source unless Google is allowed to use the free labour of contributers without restriction or payment.

            They talk more about it here and here.

            Personally I don’t have a side in this fight but nothing I have seen has made me shy away from using their products.

            • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Tbh it’s the English language that decides what counts as Open Source. Free/Open Source software has been established for decades at this point. It’s good that they changed the name to “Source First”.

              I think that better wording would be “the organization that doesn’t believe that foss solves every problem”. For project like immich AGPL is completely fine but for the android keyboard it might not be a good idea to allow Google to use it to abuse their customers.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              It isn’t open source or free software. There software prevents you from having the same rights as the parent organization. You can’t fork the project if there is a big development shift you don’t like so it is effectively proprietary.

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep and eventually there will be a paid proprietary version. That’s usually how it goes. I hope I am wrong.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        They promised at least that’s not how they’re going to do this, at least. But in the end, it’s easy to backpaddle on these promises.

        Still: you can always fork the project.

  • d_k_bo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Declaring the use without a paid license as “Unlicensed” is very misleading since the project is also licensed under the GNU AGPL v3.0.